FEATURE STORY Remote Influencing Affecting Time by Dick Allgire and Glenn Wheaton Like the monster of Loch Ness, Remote Influencing has begun to raise its’ head above the waters of consciousness in the RV community. Here and there in the community you will hear bits and pieces about this or that concerning Remote Influencing, nothing really firm or substantial, just the rumblings of concern from some and comments on the possibility and the implications of this new blessing or threat from others. But what if this rumor of R.I. is true? Surely it would propel “Human Use” to the next level. With that in mind it also rings true that in human affairs there is a line of faith that has been betrayed countless times. Could humans be trusted with such a tool? You can dig about in the many forums and files on the Internet for evidence or information on R.I. but you will only find useless, fantasy-laden non-information or slightly cryptic comments on a test here and there. The amount of misinformation about R.I. has begun to proliferate at an alarming rate. It seems to dwarf any real substantive data on this very interesting topic. Can remote viewers exert influence while at target? For some it would seem impossible, since they believe that the remote viewer actually collects the data or information from sources discarnate from the original target in its time. Those sources are referred to as the Akashic record or other similar memories or libraries. Logic would dictate that R.I. would be an exercise in futility for these people. In the community we say that remote viewing is outside of space and time. As such it is just as probable that the viewer does in fact slip the bounds of space-time and does actually ingress upon the real event in its real time. This is an entirely equal possibility. If this latter explanation has merit then more questions arise regarding the possibility of R.I. Does a remote viewer have “presence” at a distant target in time? Can any such presence be amplified to cross the boundary of the passive into the active? If this is possible then R.I. becomes a great deal more interesting. Let’s take another step further. There is an on-going project involving the sinking of the RMS Titanic. We all remember the movie, especially the dramatic escape from below decks when Kate Winslet (Rose) finds her way down to free Leonardo DiCaprio (Jack), handcuffed to a pipe moments from drowning in the rising water. They find their way to a passage that is blocked by a gate, meant to keep the lower class passengers segregated from those in first class. Remote viewers are working the events surrounding young Ebba Andersson, a little girl who perished with her family aboard the Titanic. Not in the movie; in real life. Ebba was a real person, who sailed on the Titanic during its fateful maiden voyage. History lists her as one of the many victims of the tragedy. It is known that for some reason she was lost below decks and never made it to a lifeboat. She had a chance to escape. A young girl of six, intelligent and daring, she was squeezed through the grated barrier separating the class passengers and told to go to the open deck of the ship. She never made it. She perished because it is believed she took the path of least resistance at a critical point in time. She turned left instead of right. Could she be influenced to turn right instead of left, and make it up to get placed in one of the lifeboats? This is quite a story to model into a plan to reach back across time and space in experimental R.I. Over the past three years skilled remote viewers have identified “points of observation,” moments in time where the viewers can ascertain the flow and surge of humanity on the decks and in the corridors of the 2nd and 3rd class passenger spaces aboard the vessel. Keep in mind that the viewers always work the targets blind, with no frontloading. The level of target contact required to undertake viewing of this type involves altered state remote viewing, where the viewer is actually "at target" with full experiential immersion. The viewers are not sitting at a table with pen and paper getting ideas and concepts about the target. They are there. In the course of the project viewers have been able to identify “milestones” –perhaps you could call them waypoints- of observation, where they have identified the route the young girl took once she had access to movement in the 2nd class areas. This is the critical area where there was a chance for escape. This data could be collected safely by remote viewers on target with no intent to interfere (if it is possible) with the young girls movement. Once her route had been determined a plan was made to approach the possibility of influencing her route of escape to the upper decks. The R.I. Plan consists of a phased approach dealing only with matters related to movement of the girl and not any other aspect of her condition. This was decided because the intent is to affect only which direction she would turn at critical points in time, her time. The creation of a plan to even experiment with R.I. is incredibly complex. Goals must be defined and methods developed and agreed upon. Points of observation made in remote viewing sessions are critical in establishing a perspective on the target. And then there is the ever looming prospect of “The Paradox.” If the R.I. is successful, those involved in the experiment may not even realize it. The results might actually preclude the R.I. effort from ever taking place. The implications can become a maze of sorts and downright confounding in almost all cases. To construct an R.I. Plan in the case of this young girl requires educated assistance in areas of child psychology, Neuro Linguistic Programming, crowd behavior, analysis of the ship plan, methodology to exert the influence, and a myriad of other considerations too numerous to list here. If R.I. is possible its’ effect will surely be one of the sensory and not one of mind control or a voice from the beyond. The effect will be received and processed by the intended target as sensory data processed through its subconscious to the primary awareness. It is not likely that a viewer could demonstrate enough presence to actually control something as robust as a small child amidst the panic aboard the Titanic. It is far more likely that the viewer might be able to generate an urge or an inclination of direction. In the next phase it was decided to try and keep the effect (if any) in the past without the conflict of an ethical dilemma or the emergence of the paradox. Use remote viewing to establish the points of observation and then attempt to influence a change that would not affect the ultimate outcome of that night but would produce a change in those critical observation points. Would the route data change as a result of the effort? How do you protect the initial route data from the paradox? This one question alone took 11 months to resolve. The problems all seem to be related to time. Remote viewing may well be outside of time, but it is not outside of the order of events in time. A method had to be devised to find a point of observation from which to view sans paradox. Be assured this is no small task. If one was to presume that time could be cheated and history changed we are reminded that it does come at a price. This price manifests initially in questions of ethics and right. What right do you have and who made you god? It would seem clear that when embarking on this type of effort that it could have severe emotional repercussions. If not for the possibility of solving a riddle of time and of event influencing it would perhaps better to leave this one alone. Can it work? We believe it can, but we also believe it is extremely remote that it will be successful on an initial attempt. One thing seems certain; the methodology must be quantified and restricted to sensory influence alone. Any deviation from the R.I Plan would probably not achieve any level of success. If there is a successful result in affecting the route of this young girl one has to answer the next question. What do we do now? Do we take a step beyond and give her the key to her maze? What would you do?    PRINT THIS ARTICLE Privacy Statement Copyright © 2001, H.R.V.G. All rights reserved.

AUGUST-SEPTEMBER ARTICLES ·Remote Influencing ·NYC Trip ·Gathering Sounds    Sketches    Sketch 1    Sketch 2    Sketch 3    Sketch 4    Sketch 5    Sketch 6    Sketch 7    Sketch 8    Sketch 9    Sketch 10    Sketch 11    Sketch 12    Sketch 13 ·Stray Cat    Page 2 ·Play It Again SAM! ·Discussions on RV ·The Sports Book