NEWS: Analysis & Commentary Good Data - - - Wrong Target What Went Wrong? by Dick Allgire Here is a fairly interesting example of what we call undisciplined remote viewing. By undisciplined we mean getting good data, but for the wrong target. It is embarrassing - nothing to be real proud of - but none the less demonstrative of how slippery remote viewing can be. I try to work at least 5 targets per week, and since I am very busy I try to plan ahead and have a schedule of when to work certain targets. Maybe an operational target one day, then a validation target with instant feedback, and then on another day a homework target with no feedback available until it’s turned in. The week of the 4th of July holiday I had several targets lined up ready to work. On Thursday, July 5th I worked PPVI-WPQS. This target was cued by Sita and published on the HRVG Target page. No feedback was available until Saturday, July 7. I also knew that my next target, to be viewed a day or two later, would be OXWF-JLRA from the HRVG on line target section. So on Thursday I sat down and viewed. My data suggested a fairly simple natural setting with a manmade structure, which I drew as a bridge. I had quality visuals during S-1 Playfair¹ data collection. The gestalts of natural land and simple straight bridge-like structure carried over into S-2 Nimo² Playfair¹. In fact I actually wrote the word bridge, and “simple bridge” in session. And then these gestalts were arranged in my S-3 site sketch as a bridge in a simple natural setting. On Saturday, July 7th I got feedback for this session. Target PPVI-WPQS was not a bridge. It was a photo of a royal luau with Hawaiian King David Kalakaua and Robert Lewis Stevenson. Okay, so I had an off session. It happens to all of us. Later that day I worked another target from the HRVG On Line Training section, cued by Jason. This target was OXWF-JLRA. When I clicked on the feedback photo, I recognized it immediately. Not from the session I had just done, but from the session I had worked two days earlier. Compare the data I produced working PPVI-WPQS to the feedback for OXWF-JLRA. Here is my bridge. Right data, wrong target ID: It looks as though I worked the next target in my lineup. A target from a totally different source, cued by a different targeteer, but one which I knew was coming. When you remote view you have to be very certain in your mind and in your awareness and intent about which target you are working. How do you explain it? Has this ever happened to you? Submissions are welcome.   ¹Playfair is the stage one data collection matrix used in HRVG methodology. It was named for Merriweather Playfair, a British cryptologist in World War II. ²NIMO is a probing icon. It stands for Neuro Interrogation Mask Overlay.  PRINT THIS ARTICLE Privacy Statement Copyright © 2001, H.R.V.G. All rights reserved.

JUNE/JULY ARTICLES ·La Propagation èlègante    Page 2 ·Dr. Dean Radin ·What Went Wrong?    Sketch 1    Sketch 2    Sketch 3    OXWF-JLRA ·MINDAZZLE ·Discussions on RV    Page 2