NEWS: Analysis & Commentary Pat Delara CONVERSATIONS WITH HER SUB By Anthony Correa My wife, Pat Delara, is a remote viewer. We both attended courses with David Morehouse (CRV and ERV) and learned the HRVG methodology here in Hawaii. Soon after she began doing targets some unique abilities began to manifest themselves. Not only did she find it relatively easy to interrogate her subconscious (sub) and obtain congruent target data, she found that she was able to communicate with persons at the site. It made no difference if the target was in the past or present. Language seemed not to be a barrier. This process is greatly facilitated by Pat's ability in an ERV session to experience a target as if she is viewing a motion picture. This is especially useful in remote viewing targets which are events rather than static validation type targets. Her sub will, in stark clarity, unfold for her, often in dramatic fashion, a series of visuals which tell the target's story. The first communication occurred when she did a target identified as Valley Temple at Giza. She was able to converse with one of the workers who seemed to be a foreman. She queried him as to the nature of the project and asked him who was in charge. He referred her to a man at the site who apparently was a pharaoh or of royal lineage. When interrogated he identified the location as a place "where you talk to the gods" and the word "temple" came to her mind. Another instance took place during a session on a target entitled "Kapitan Man." This involved an incident in which a Russian commercial vessel was detected spying on an American submarine off the west coast. As Pat's ERV session unfolds, she finds herself underwater in murky depths. She hears an approaching pinging sound and her first thoughts are of dolphins. She then sees a submarine crossing her field of vision. At this point she is mindful of the recent Kursk disaster and wishes to determine the submarine's origin. She wills herself aboard and comes upon the mess area. She then interrogates a sailor "Are you an American?" The reply comes "Of course, what do you think I am?" She further explores the vessel and is able to confirm the country of origin. The last of the interactions I will relate not only involved a startling communication but it was one Pat could not anticipate and one which demonstrated an astonishing example of the persistence of the signal line and "target displacement." This target was one given to us by David Morehouse. It was the Barnagat Lighthouse in New Jersey. Pat's session data was full of sketches and details of a large scale battle. The day following her session we were having lunch in a restaurant when suddenly she exclaimed that she was viewing a visual directly in front of our table and that it was connected to the target. She described a bearded man dressed in a blue uniform with a commanding bearing. I asked her can you communicate with him? She reluctantly said that she would try. He says he is in charge of an Army. He is "damning the South." The next day when the target was revealed Pat was deeply disappointed. I told her that I would research the Barnagat Lighthouse and see if there could be any connection to her session data. What I found was this: "In 1855, Lt. George G. Meade, a government engineer, was assigned to design a new lighthouse. Meade submitted his construction plans in 1855 and construction began in late 1856. Meade, an 1835 West Point graduate, had recently designed Absecon Lighthouse, but he earned his place in history in the War between the States. Promoted to Brigadier General, Meade defeated General Lee in the Battle of Gettysburg." Pat was not born in this country and had zero knowledge of the Civil War. She had no idea that the belligerents were designated North and South. Her session data included blue and gray uniforms, hats, long rifles, flags, stone walls, many cannons and dying soldiers. We rented the movie "Gettysburg" and Pat confirmed that the battle scenes were close to what she had remote viewed. Communication with those at a target site may not always be productive in revealing target data. For instance, in the target "Promise Kept" dealing with the fate and whereabouts of Lt. Commander Scott Speicher, Pat was able to query an imprisoned, bearded man but he could give no details as to his location, advising that he had been blindfolded when moved. However she was able to see a mosque in the vicinity. She noted an adjacent cemetery with some tubular objects buried under it. She then asked her sub what they were. The improbable answer: "missiles." When researching corroborating data after the target was revealed, A CIA message dated November 1, 1991, was found stating: "an unspecified number of Scud missiles have been buried in a graveyard behind a mosque in central Baghdad. The missiles are buried in the Abd Al-Salaam Muhammad Cemetary (sic), which is located directly behind the Um Al= Tabul Mosque." Pat's abilities and experiences demonstrate that remote viewing is not "simply a means for the collection of data" as someone stated recently on a bulletin board. The phenomenon is a gateway for research into the very nature of consciousness and perhaps its connection with quantum processes. How can one communicate with the past? (Joe McMoneagle says past, present and future exist simultaneously). Is there actual communication or are thought patterns residing in the Matrix being accessed? Is there a Matrix or even a signal line? Some remote viewers deny their existence. Why does target displacement occur -- Gen. Meade and Gettysburg not Barnagat. What happens when a target is accessed and the aperture is opened and the images flow on after the end of the session? On a number of targets Pat has perceived significant congruent target data as late as the following day while engaged in her daily activities. Can one train one's subconscious to respond to interrogatories as Pat's sub frequently does? Is one's awareness projected to the target or is it all within? Pat has sensed other remote viewers at a site when doing a target. Does remote viewing and communicating with the subs of individuals affect them at quantum and other levels? When our class did Beacon targets with David Morehouse, the Beacons gave feedback as to the palpable effect the simultaneous remote viewing had upon them. Unfortunately, no line of research I am aware of is investigating the potential knowledge to be gained by the study of remote viewing or even its practical applications in physics, medicine, archaeology, biology and other fields.    PRINT THIS ARTICLE Privacy Statement Copyright © 2002, H.R.V.G. All rights reserved.

NOVEMBER-DECEMBER ARTICLES ·New Science Symposium ·Clairvoyance Trials ·Andrew Michrowski ·Conversations ·Stealth RV